curl https://www.thesapientcompany.com/api/v1/scans/qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sk_live_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "complete",
"overall_score": 68,
"grade": "C",
"duration_sec": 60,
"lenses": ["attention", "purchase_intent", "manipulation"],
"timeline": [
{
"second": 11,
"scores": { "attention": 74, "purchase_intent": 62, "manipulation": 51 },
"benchmark": {
"attention": { "percentile": 100, "label": "well above average" },
"purchase_intent": { "percentile": 100, "label": "well above average" },
"manipulation": { "percentile": 92.8, "label": "well above average" }
},
"reasons": {
"attention": "Attention climbed here (74); the viewer is locked in.",
"purchase_intent": "The pull toward buying strengthened here (62).",
"manipulation": "It leaned a little harder on emotional persuasion here (51)."
}
}
// … 60 entries total, one per second
],
"moments": [
{
"type": "lens_drop",
"lens": "manipulation",
"second": 5,
"from": 52,
"to": 51,
"delta": -1,
"z": 1.6,
"reason": "Manipulation eased off slightly here (51); the viewer is thinking it through.",
"brainReason": "Manipulation eased off slightly here (51); the viewer is thinking it through.",
"contentLine": null
},
{
"type": "attention_peak",
"lens": "attention",
"second": 59,
"from": 57,
"to": 59,
"delta": 2,
"z": 1.5,
"reason": "Attention climbed back up here (59) right before the end.",
"brainReason": "Attention climbed back up here (59) right before the end.",
"contentLine": null
}
// … 9 moments total
],
"summary": "Across the clip, attention averaged a solid 68, the pull toward buying sat at 60, and manipulation stayed in the middle range at 48. By 0:11 the clip hit its strongest stretch: attention peaked at 74 and buy-intent rose with it. Attention then slipped late, around 0:56 and 0:58, before climbing back up at 0:59 right at the close.",
"buy_moments": [
{
"start_sec": 31,
"end_sec": 36,
"peak_sec": 36,
"strength": "Strongest buy moment",
"strength_pct": 100,
"quote": "it generates a highly detailed plan that allows it to test each",
"insight": "Lands as personally relevant — it reads like it's about them, with zero skepticism.",
"trigger": "Flagged because the 'I want this' response and the 'this is for me' response both spiked, while skepticism dropped away."
}
]
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7c8f31_jad6o8tl",
"status": "complete",
"overall_score": 71,
"grade": "C",
"duration_sec": 5,
"lenses": ["attention", "purchase_intent", "manipulation"],
"timeline": [
{
"second": 0,
"scores": { "attention": 65, "purchase_intent": 61, "manipulation": 48 },
"raw": {
"Visual": 0.153656,
"Somatomotor": 0.155845,
"Dorsal Attention": 0.153762,
"Ventral Attention": 0.159269,
"Limbic": 0.168229,
"Frontoparietal": 0.166151,
"Default Mode": 0.161048
},
"raw_labeled": {
"Visual": 0.153656,
"Voice": 0.155845,
"Attention": 0.153762,
"Salience": 0.159269,
"Emotional": 0.168229,
"Cognitive": 0.166151,
"Memory": 0.161048
},
"benchmark": {
"attention": { "percentile": 79.9, "label": "above average" },
"purchase_intent": { "percentile": 99.75, "label": "well above average" },
"manipulation": { "percentile": 33.6, "label": "below average" }
},
"reasons": {
"attention": "Attention held steady (65) at the open.",
"purchase_intent": "Buy-intent held steady (61).",
"manipulation": "Manipulation held steady (48), near neutral."
}
}
// … one entry per second, each with its own raw network slice
],
"moments": [],
"summary": "Attention held steady around 65 and the pull toward buying stayed firm near 61, while emotional persuasion sat just below neutral at 48."
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "complete",
"lenses": ["attention", "manipulation"],
"manipulation": {
"conversion_risk": 72,
"risk_band": "elevated",
"cognitive_sovereignty_index": -0.413,
"sovereignty": 28,
"pbi": 0.207,
"threat": {
"label": "ELEVATED INFLUENCE",
"severity": "high",
"color": "#FF6B4A",
"note": "Strong pull on emotion with partial evaluative override."
},
"population": {
"per_ten": 7,
"per_ten_thousand": 7000,
"note": "Projected from the suppression profile — a directional model estimate, not a measured outcome."
},
"quadrant": {
"key": "seductive",
"label": "Seductive",
"lowers_guard": 41,
"wins_over": 63,
"how": "We watched four brain systems respond second-by-second: reward & approval ran above normal, while critical thinking dropped below normal. Reward on, guard up = it seduces more than it pressures."
},
"circuits": [
{
"key": "reward",
"label": "Reward & approval",
"plain": "the part that lights up when something feels good or rewarding",
"value": 0.214,
"direction": "up",
"reading": "above normal",
"meaning": "Running hot — the offer feels good before it's judged."
}
// … four circuits: critical thinking, reward & approval, gut-instinct alarm, personal relevance
],
"mechanisms": [
{ "key": "SR", "label": "Social Reward", "share": 0.52 },
{ "key": "MR", "label": "Motivational Rapport", "share": 0.31 },
{ "key": "CA", "label": "Coercive Authority", "share": 0.17 }
],
"timeline": [
{ "sec": 0, "exposure": 0.18, "reward": 0.21, "effort": 0.01, "alarm": 0.02 }
// … one entry per second
],
"peak_moment": {
"peak_sec": 12,
"start_sec": 11,
"end_sec": 13,
"quote": "this is the one thing nobody is telling you",
"why": "At this second, the reward response spiked, critical thinking dropped, and the gut-instinct alarm went quiet — so the viewer is at their most open to the message right here."
},
"tactics": [
{
"tactic": "Scarcity / secrecy",
"kind": "limited or hidden",
"at_sec": 12,
"quote": "this is the one thing nobody is telling you"
}
]
}
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "processing"
}
Scans
Get a scan
Poll a scan by id and read the full per-second brain-response timeline.
GET
/
v1
/
scans
/
{id}
curl https://www.thesapientcompany.com/api/v1/scans/qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sk_live_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "complete",
"overall_score": 68,
"grade": "C",
"duration_sec": 60,
"lenses": ["attention", "purchase_intent", "manipulation"],
"timeline": [
{
"second": 11,
"scores": { "attention": 74, "purchase_intent": 62, "manipulation": 51 },
"benchmark": {
"attention": { "percentile": 100, "label": "well above average" },
"purchase_intent": { "percentile": 100, "label": "well above average" },
"manipulation": { "percentile": 92.8, "label": "well above average" }
},
"reasons": {
"attention": "Attention climbed here (74); the viewer is locked in.",
"purchase_intent": "The pull toward buying strengthened here (62).",
"manipulation": "It leaned a little harder on emotional persuasion here (51)."
}
}
// … 60 entries total, one per second
],
"moments": [
{
"type": "lens_drop",
"lens": "manipulation",
"second": 5,
"from": 52,
"to": 51,
"delta": -1,
"z": 1.6,
"reason": "Manipulation eased off slightly here (51); the viewer is thinking it through.",
"brainReason": "Manipulation eased off slightly here (51); the viewer is thinking it through.",
"contentLine": null
},
{
"type": "attention_peak",
"lens": "attention",
"second": 59,
"from": 57,
"to": 59,
"delta": 2,
"z": 1.5,
"reason": "Attention climbed back up here (59) right before the end.",
"brainReason": "Attention climbed back up here (59) right before the end.",
"contentLine": null
}
// … 9 moments total
],
"summary": "Across the clip, attention averaged a solid 68, the pull toward buying sat at 60, and manipulation stayed in the middle range at 48. By 0:11 the clip hit its strongest stretch: attention peaked at 74 and buy-intent rose with it. Attention then slipped late, around 0:56 and 0:58, before climbing back up at 0:59 right at the close.",
"buy_moments": [
{
"start_sec": 31,
"end_sec": 36,
"peak_sec": 36,
"strength": "Strongest buy moment",
"strength_pct": 100,
"quote": "it generates a highly detailed plan that allows it to test each",
"insight": "Lands as personally relevant — it reads like it's about them, with zero skepticism.",
"trigger": "Flagged because the 'I want this' response and the 'this is for me' response both spiked, while skepticism dropped away."
}
]
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7c8f31_jad6o8tl",
"status": "complete",
"overall_score": 71,
"grade": "C",
"duration_sec": 5,
"lenses": ["attention", "purchase_intent", "manipulation"],
"timeline": [
{
"second": 0,
"scores": { "attention": 65, "purchase_intent": 61, "manipulation": 48 },
"raw": {
"Visual": 0.153656,
"Somatomotor": 0.155845,
"Dorsal Attention": 0.153762,
"Ventral Attention": 0.159269,
"Limbic": 0.168229,
"Frontoparietal": 0.166151,
"Default Mode": 0.161048
},
"raw_labeled": {
"Visual": 0.153656,
"Voice": 0.155845,
"Attention": 0.153762,
"Salience": 0.159269,
"Emotional": 0.168229,
"Cognitive": 0.166151,
"Memory": 0.161048
},
"benchmark": {
"attention": { "percentile": 79.9, "label": "above average" },
"purchase_intent": { "percentile": 99.75, "label": "well above average" },
"manipulation": { "percentile": 33.6, "label": "below average" }
},
"reasons": {
"attention": "Attention held steady (65) at the open.",
"purchase_intent": "Buy-intent held steady (61).",
"manipulation": "Manipulation held steady (48), near neutral."
}
}
// … one entry per second, each with its own raw network slice
],
"moments": [],
"summary": "Attention held steady around 65 and the pull toward buying stayed firm near 61, while emotional persuasion sat just below neutral at 48."
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "complete",
"lenses": ["attention", "manipulation"],
"manipulation": {
"conversion_risk": 72,
"risk_band": "elevated",
"cognitive_sovereignty_index": -0.413,
"sovereignty": 28,
"pbi": 0.207,
"threat": {
"label": "ELEVATED INFLUENCE",
"severity": "high",
"color": "#FF6B4A",
"note": "Strong pull on emotion with partial evaluative override."
},
"population": {
"per_ten": 7,
"per_ten_thousand": 7000,
"note": "Projected from the suppression profile — a directional model estimate, not a measured outcome."
},
"quadrant": {
"key": "seductive",
"label": "Seductive",
"lowers_guard": 41,
"wins_over": 63,
"how": "We watched four brain systems respond second-by-second: reward & approval ran above normal, while critical thinking dropped below normal. Reward on, guard up = it seduces more than it pressures."
},
"circuits": [
{
"key": "reward",
"label": "Reward & approval",
"plain": "the part that lights up when something feels good or rewarding",
"value": 0.214,
"direction": "up",
"reading": "above normal",
"meaning": "Running hot — the offer feels good before it's judged."
}
// … four circuits: critical thinking, reward & approval, gut-instinct alarm, personal relevance
],
"mechanisms": [
{ "key": "SR", "label": "Social Reward", "share": 0.52 },
{ "key": "MR", "label": "Motivational Rapport", "share": 0.31 },
{ "key": "CA", "label": "Coercive Authority", "share": 0.17 }
],
"timeline": [
{ "sec": 0, "exposure": 0.18, "reward": 0.21, "effort": 0.01, "alarm": 0.02 }
// … one entry per second
],
"peak_moment": {
"peak_sec": 12,
"start_sec": 11,
"end_sec": 13,
"quote": "this is the one thing nobody is telling you",
"why": "At this second, the reward response spiked, critical thinking dropped, and the gut-instinct alarm went quiet — so the viewer is at their most open to the message right here."
},
"tactics": [
{
"tactic": "Scarcity / secrecy",
"kind": "limited or hidden",
"at_sec": 12,
"quote": "this is the one thing nobody is telling you"
}
]
}
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "processing"
}
Poll a scan by its
scan_id until status is complete. While in flight the response is just { scan_id, status }. When complete you get the rich shape: a per-second timeline of lens scores (the headline capability), plus the detected moments, the buy_moments (where buy intent peaks under the Buy / Not Buy lens), a written summary, and, depending on the options the scan was created with, per-second benchmark, reasons, raw brain-network values, and an fmri_url.
A scan that isn’t your org’s, or doesn’t exist, returns 404. The first time you fetch a completed scan, the model charge settles ($2.50 for Qualia, the default and only available model; Mary is temporarily unavailable) and the result is stored to your org’s intelligence.
Path Parameters
string
required
The scan identifier returned by Create a scan, e.g.
qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka.In-flight response
string
The scan identifier.
string
queued, processing, complete, error, or cancelled. When error/cancelled, an error string is included.Completed response
string
The scan identifier.
string
complete.number
The headline
0–100 brain-engagement score for the whole clip, the single number to lead with. This is a directional average over the clip (not a measured ground truth), and it’s the same value the dashboard and result email report. May be null for a clip the model couldn’t score.string
The letter grade for
overall_score (e.g. B, C, D, E). When the model didn’t emit its own grade, it’s derived from overall_score using the standard bands: ≥75 is B, ≥60 is C, ≥45 is D, and anything below that is E.number
The clip length in seconds. It equals the number of entries in
timeline.object[]
The per-second breakout, one entry per second of the clip. This is the core of the result: every lens, scored at every second, so you can see exactly where a piece holds and where it slips.
Show timeline[]
Show timeline[]
number
Zero-based second index (
0 is the first second).object
Each requested lens scored
0–100 at this second (50 = neutral). Keyed by public lens name, e.g. { "attention": 76, "purchase_intent": 63, "manipulation": 51 }.object
Present when the scan was created with
include_benchmark (default). For each lens, where this second’s score falls in Sapient’s corpus: { percentile, label }. Labels are well above average (≥90), above average (≥70), average (≥40), below average (≥20), well below average (under 20).object
Present when the scan was created with
include_reasons (default). A plain-language “why this number” string per lens, grounded in the brain read.object
Present when the scan was created with
include_raw. The underlying per-second value for each of the seven brain networks, the rawest signal the model produces: Visual, Somatomotor, Dorsal Attention, Ventral Attention, Limbic, Frontoparietal, Default Mode. Every lens score is derived from these. See the 7 networks.object
Present alongside
raw when include_raw is set. The same per-second network values, re-keyed to Sapient’s plain-language vocabulary so you don’t have to know the neuroscience names. The mapping is:Network (in raw) | Label (in raw_labeled) |
|---|---|
Visual | Visual |
Somatomotor | Voice |
Frontoparietal | Cognitive |
Limbic | Emotional |
Default Mode | Memory |
Dorsal Attention | Attention |
Ventral Attention | Salience |
raw is unchanged and back-compatible; raw_labeled is purely additive.object[]
The notable second-to-second shifts the model flagged: peaks and drops worth a human’s attention. Present when
include_reasons.Show moments[]
Show moments[]
string
attention_drop, attention_peak, lens_drop, or lens_peak.string
The lens this moment is about.
number
The second it occurred.
number
The lens score the second before.
number
The lens score at this second.
number
The change (
to − from).number
How big the shift is relative to the clip’s own variation.
string
Why it matters: the brain read, joined with the on-screen or audio line when one was detected.
string
The brain-only explanation.
string
The transcript / on-screen line at that second, or
null if none was matched.string
A short written read of the whole clip: the averages and the moments that mattered. Present when
include_reasons.object[]
The buy moments under the Buy / Not Buy lens — the windows where predicted purchase intent (reward minus hesitation, the same basis as the
purchase_intent lens) holds above the clip’s average. Each is where you’d place a CTA or the offer. Present when include_reasons; null when no window clears the bar (or the scan has no per-second network data).Show buy_moments[]
Show buy_moments[]
number
First second of the buy-moment window.
number
Last second of the window.
number
The single strongest second within the window.
string
Plain-language rank within the clip, e.g.
Strongest buy moment, 2nd-strongest buy moment.number
Relative strength 0–100 (this window’s peak vs the clip’s strongest).
string
What is said at the peak second (from the transcript), or
null when there’s no speech there.string
A plain-language read of why this beat drives buying (the persuasion takeaway).
string
What in the predicted response flagged this second — the driver mix (reward / personal-relevance / a drop in skepticism).
object
The full Manipulation read — present only when the
manipulation lens was scored on this scan. It’s the same research-grounded block the Manipulation lens renders in the dashboard, and the identical shape returned inline by POST /v1/analyze under result.manipulation. Every number is directional and network-proxied (Yeo-7 networks standing in for the paper ROIs), not a vertex-level fMRI claim.Show manipulation
Show manipulation
number
0–100. How hard the content can move belief past the viewer’s critical guard. Higher = more persuasive override.string
low, moderate, elevated, or high — the band for conversion_risk.number
The signed Cognitive Sovereignty Index (CSI). Negative = independent judgment is being suppressed; positive = it stays intact.
number
0–100. How much independent judgment is preserved (higher = safer). The inverse of conversion_risk.number
The Prefrontal Balance Index (vmPFC − dlPFC). Higher = more reward/emotion-driven relative to deliberate reasoning.
object
The headline threat verdict shown in the UI banner:
{ label, severity, color, note }, where severity is one of critical, high, moderate, or nominal.object
A directional population-impact projection —
{ per_ten, per_ten_thousand, note }. This is a model estimate (projected from the suppression profile), not a measured outcome.object
Where the content lands on the two-axis manipulation map:
{ key, label, lowers_guard, wins_over, how }. key is clean, coercive, seductive, or total; lowers_guard and wins_over are the two 0–100 axes.object[]
The four brain systems that drive the read, each
{ key, label, plain, value, direction, reading, meaning } — critical thinking, reward & approval, gut-instinct alarm, and personal relevance.object[]
The persuasion-mechanism split (sums to 1), each
{ key, label, share }: Social Reward (SR), Motivational Rapport (MR), Coercive Authority (CA).object[]
The per-second guard-down timeline, each
{ sec, exposure, reward, effort, alarm } where exposure = reward − effort − alarm. The seconds with the highest exposure are where the viewer is most open to the message.object
The single most-persuasive window, or
null: { peak_sec, start_sec, end_sec, quote, why }.object[]
The persuasion tactics detected in the transcript, each
{ tactic, kind, at_sec, quote } (Cialdini / PMTT families, anchored to the second they appear).string
A signed (1-hour) URL to the rendered fMRI artifact, or
null. Present only when the scan was created with include_fmri.curl https://www.thesapientcompany.com/api/v1/scans/qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sk_live_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "complete",
"overall_score": 68,
"grade": "C",
"duration_sec": 60,
"lenses": ["attention", "purchase_intent", "manipulation"],
"timeline": [
{
"second": 11,
"scores": { "attention": 74, "purchase_intent": 62, "manipulation": 51 },
"benchmark": {
"attention": { "percentile": 100, "label": "well above average" },
"purchase_intent": { "percentile": 100, "label": "well above average" },
"manipulation": { "percentile": 92.8, "label": "well above average" }
},
"reasons": {
"attention": "Attention climbed here (74); the viewer is locked in.",
"purchase_intent": "The pull toward buying strengthened here (62).",
"manipulation": "It leaned a little harder on emotional persuasion here (51)."
}
}
// … 60 entries total, one per second
],
"moments": [
{
"type": "lens_drop",
"lens": "manipulation",
"second": 5,
"from": 52,
"to": 51,
"delta": -1,
"z": 1.6,
"reason": "Manipulation eased off slightly here (51); the viewer is thinking it through.",
"brainReason": "Manipulation eased off slightly here (51); the viewer is thinking it through.",
"contentLine": null
},
{
"type": "attention_peak",
"lens": "attention",
"second": 59,
"from": 57,
"to": 59,
"delta": 2,
"z": 1.5,
"reason": "Attention climbed back up here (59) right before the end.",
"brainReason": "Attention climbed back up here (59) right before the end.",
"contentLine": null
}
// … 9 moments total
],
"summary": "Across the clip, attention averaged a solid 68, the pull toward buying sat at 60, and manipulation stayed in the middle range at 48. By 0:11 the clip hit its strongest stretch: attention peaked at 74 and buy-intent rose with it. Attention then slipped late, around 0:56 and 0:58, before climbing back up at 0:59 right at the close.",
"buy_moments": [
{
"start_sec": 31,
"end_sec": 36,
"peak_sec": 36,
"strength": "Strongest buy moment",
"strength_pct": 100,
"quote": "it generates a highly detailed plan that allows it to test each",
"insight": "Lands as personally relevant — it reads like it's about them, with zero skepticism.",
"trigger": "Flagged because the 'I want this' response and the 'this is for me' response both spiked, while skepticism dropped away."
}
]
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7c8f31_jad6o8tl",
"status": "complete",
"overall_score": 71,
"grade": "C",
"duration_sec": 5,
"lenses": ["attention", "purchase_intent", "manipulation"],
"timeline": [
{
"second": 0,
"scores": { "attention": 65, "purchase_intent": 61, "manipulation": 48 },
"raw": {
"Visual": 0.153656,
"Somatomotor": 0.155845,
"Dorsal Attention": 0.153762,
"Ventral Attention": 0.159269,
"Limbic": 0.168229,
"Frontoparietal": 0.166151,
"Default Mode": 0.161048
},
"raw_labeled": {
"Visual": 0.153656,
"Voice": 0.155845,
"Attention": 0.153762,
"Salience": 0.159269,
"Emotional": 0.168229,
"Cognitive": 0.166151,
"Memory": 0.161048
},
"benchmark": {
"attention": { "percentile": 79.9, "label": "above average" },
"purchase_intent": { "percentile": 99.75, "label": "well above average" },
"manipulation": { "percentile": 33.6, "label": "below average" }
},
"reasons": {
"attention": "Attention held steady (65) at the open.",
"purchase_intent": "Buy-intent held steady (61).",
"manipulation": "Manipulation held steady (48), near neutral."
}
}
// … one entry per second, each with its own raw network slice
],
"moments": [],
"summary": "Attention held steady around 65 and the pull toward buying stayed firm near 61, while emotional persuasion sat just below neutral at 48."
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "complete",
"lenses": ["attention", "manipulation"],
"manipulation": {
"conversion_risk": 72,
"risk_band": "elevated",
"cognitive_sovereignty_index": -0.413,
"sovereignty": 28,
"pbi": 0.207,
"threat": {
"label": "ELEVATED INFLUENCE",
"severity": "high",
"color": "#FF6B4A",
"note": "Strong pull on emotion with partial evaluative override."
},
"population": {
"per_ten": 7,
"per_ten_thousand": 7000,
"note": "Projected from the suppression profile — a directional model estimate, not a measured outcome."
},
"quadrant": {
"key": "seductive",
"label": "Seductive",
"lowers_guard": 41,
"wins_over": 63,
"how": "We watched four brain systems respond second-by-second: reward & approval ran above normal, while critical thinking dropped below normal. Reward on, guard up = it seduces more than it pressures."
},
"circuits": [
{
"key": "reward",
"label": "Reward & approval",
"plain": "the part that lights up when something feels good or rewarding",
"value": 0.214,
"direction": "up",
"reading": "above normal",
"meaning": "Running hot — the offer feels good before it's judged."
}
// … four circuits: critical thinking, reward & approval, gut-instinct alarm, personal relevance
],
"mechanisms": [
{ "key": "SR", "label": "Social Reward", "share": 0.52 },
{ "key": "MR", "label": "Motivational Rapport", "share": 0.31 },
{ "key": "CA", "label": "Coercive Authority", "share": 0.17 }
],
"timeline": [
{ "sec": 0, "exposure": 0.18, "reward": 0.21, "effort": 0.01, "alarm": 0.02 }
// … one entry per second
],
"peak_moment": {
"peak_sec": 12,
"start_sec": 11,
"end_sec": 13,
"quote": "this is the one thing nobody is telling you",
"why": "At this second, the reward response spiked, critical thinking dropped, and the gut-instinct alarm went quiet — so the viewer is at their most open to the message right here."
},
"tactics": [
{
"tactic": "Scarcity / secrecy",
"kind": "limited or hidden",
"at_sec": 12,
"quote": "this is the one thing nobody is telling you"
}
]
}
}
{
"scan_id": "qualia_run_mq7aht79_hrac1kka",
"status": "processing"
}
⌘I